Comments on: The Super Stock Screener Ranking System http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/2007/09/the-super-stock-screener-ranking-system/ Articles and investment ideas for better stock market investments Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:59:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Super Stock Screener http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/2007/09/the-super-stock-screener-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-146 Super Stock Screener Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:25:31 +0000 http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/?p=44#comment-146 Unfortunately, we do not offer that capability to drill down on the factors that cause a stock to be ranked 1 - 5. Unfortunately, we do not offer that capability to drill down on the factors that cause a stock to be ranked 1 – 5.

]]> By: Super Stock Screener http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/2007/09/the-super-stock-screener-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-145 Super Stock Screener Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:23:48 +0000 http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/?p=44#comment-145 Hello George, The Ranking System is made up of a set of stock price and financial statement anomalies that are highly indicative of future performance. However, the system does not attempt to forecast future sales growth. Hello George,

The Ranking System is made up of a set of stock price and financial statement anomalies that are highly indicative of future performance. However, the system does not attempt to forecast future sales growth.

]]> By: George Calvert http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/2007/09/the-super-stock-screener-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-47 George Calvert Wed, 06 May 2009 00:08:32 +0000 http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/?p=44#comment-47 I was surprised when I did a search for stocks with a ranking of 5 (sell) that some very high quality stocks appeared, or I thought they were high-quality - such as FCX, BHI, and FSLR for example.. Certainly these have high volatility, but for example FSLR just hit the cover off the ball for earnings, and FCX is a cheap resource stock.. (though not as cheap as it was March 9th of course).. The site doesn't allow one to drill down on the factors that cause a stock to be ranked 1 - 5 does it? I was surprised when I did a search for stocks with a ranking of 5 (sell) that some very high quality stocks appeared, or I thought they were high-quality – such as FCX, BHI, and FSLR for example..

Certainly these have high volatility, but for example FSLR just hit the cover off the ball for earnings, and FCX is a cheap resource stock.. (though not as cheap as it was March 9th of course)..

The site doesn’t allow one to drill down on the factors that cause a stock to be ranked 1 – 5 does it?

]]> By: George Calvert http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/2007/09/the-super-stock-screener-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-46 George Calvert Tue, 05 May 2009 23:23:13 +0000 http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/?p=44#comment-46 Does the ranking system attempt to determine sales growth? Otherwise, a company with good previous sales, but a dying product line, would outperform a rising star with low current sales, but explosive growth potential.. I guess the way to capture that just from financial data would be to give 'credit' in the ranking for a rising EPS number from quarter to quarter.. Does the ranking system attempt to determine sales growth?

Otherwise, a company with good previous sales, but a dying product line, would outperform a rising star with low current sales, but explosive growth potential..

I guess the way to capture that just from financial data would be to give ‘credit’ in the ranking for a rising EPS number from quarter to quarter..

]]> By: Super Stock Screener http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/2007/09/the-super-stock-screener-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Super Stock Screener Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:43:27 +0000 http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/?p=44#comment-10 Good point. At the time we did our research, we had historical data until mid-2005. After this period, our Ranking System's Buy recommendations continued to outperform the broad market. We plan to update this article in the near future to reflect this performance. In the meantime, please see our recommended portfolio's track record which we monitor on a real-time basis from mid-2006 until today: http://www.superstockscreener.com/portfolios.php Good point. At the time we did our research, we had historical data until mid-2005. After this period, our Ranking System’s Buy recommendations continued to outperform the broad market. We plan to update this article in the near future to reflect this performance.

In the meantime, please see our recommended portfolio’s track record which we monitor on a real-time basis from mid-2006 until today:
http://www.superstockscreener.com/portfolios.php

]]> By: Hardy http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/2007/09/the-super-stock-screener-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Hardy Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:04:57 +0000 http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/?p=44#comment-9 It's disingenuous not to publish data that is current. Why only shoe the "good stuff" that that ends in 2005? It’s disingenuous not to publish data that is current.

Why only shoe the “good stuff” that that ends in 2005?

]]> By: Pairs Trading « Super Stock Screener http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/2007/09/the-super-stock-screener-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Pairs Trading « Super Stock Screener Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:53:05 +0000 http://www.superstockscreener.com/blog/?p=44#comment-2 [...] underperform and possibly crash. For more information about the Ranking System, please visit our Ranking System’s methodology page. As of this September, Comcast is ranked as a “Strong Buy”, while Best Buy is [...] [...] underperform and possibly crash. For more information about the Ranking System, please visit our Ranking System’s methodology page. As of this September, Comcast is ranked as a “Strong Buy”, while Best Buy is [...]

]]>